amanfromMars 1 Tue 6 Dec 05:23 [2212060523] ….. chats on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/12/05/stack_overflow_bans_chatgpt/
Speaking Truth Unto Nations Educates, Entertains and Informs
That may well be true, but banning a tool that assembles words into answers with superficial truthiness is absolutely the right response ….. Androgynous Cupboard
Crikey, AC, blanket banning UKGBNI Parliamentarians, and others of a similar ilk and mindset in other foreign and alien lands too should there be any international and internetional mission creep, from systems because they are just as you describe …. a tool that assembles words into answers with superficial truthiness …… is not going to have them voting for you as their Personality of the Year, is it, outing them as it does as essentially quite useless self-serving fools.
…………………..
amanfromMars 1 Tue 6 Dec 06:27 [2212060627] ….. asks on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/12/06/meta_news_threat_usa/
Having your Cake and Eating IT ….. Biting the hand that feeds IT
Are the likes of Meta and Google also to be obliged to pay those rags and comics which do not provide for engaging presentation of immediate public comment to breaking news and/or are preventing greater public acceptance [or rejection] of their editorial opinion and stories of activities and events in the past, both recent and more ancient, because of its access only through a paywall?
—-
amanfromMars 1 Tue 6 Dec 10:30 [2212061030] …… being helpful on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/12/06/meta_news_threat_usa/
Re: More widely viewed?
I understand Meta claiming that them showing a preview/snippet could work to boost traffic/subscriptions to the source media but to paraphrase Christine Keeler…they would say that wouldn’t they. …. Kevin Johnston
……………………………………