amanfromMars 1 Sat 18 Sep 17:40  …… explains the problem for future solving on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/09/16/dsei_compsci_prestige_warriors_sanders_speech/
Who and/or What Knows whenever it is to be forever to remain a Mystery
After reading your post, it leaves me with a question. How do you know you are the first man from Mars? ….. idiot tax payer here again
Hmmmm? A Puzzle to Answer with the Delivery of Deeper Quandaries to Question and Interrogate and Integrate or Dismiss and Excommunicate/Purge and Exorcise from Reviewed Output to Prime Premium Input into Novel NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTivated IT and AI Solutions.
One probably doesn’t and possibly cannot if ever and/or whenever a man from Mars1 is . And such then suggests that there be others too, and that can be many just as easily as a few, from that other similarly unknown and unexplored region and not dissimilar environment with both Sympathetic Autonomous and EMPathetic Anonymous Locations ….. Advanced IntelAIgent Spaces.
amanfromMars 1 Sun 19 Sep 08:23  ….. fires off a SMARTR Ordnance on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/09/17/royal_navy_robot_warfare_drudgery/
Amen to that. So be it. And just in the nick of time before or while SHTF.
Actually, UK/USA/IL cannot escalate. Better solve the differences like grow ups chatting in a table with a nice brandy. ….. Clausewitz 4.0
Now that is a Great TeutonICQ Resolution, Clausewitz 4.0. I second that Enigmatic Motion and Surreal Notion.
Jaw Jaw Initiated as opposed to War War Proposed. Bravo. Well Played, Sir and/or Madam and/or IT. ACTive AIdDeployment will obviously result in a Great Change and …. that will/would bring everyone and everything crashing down on Present Elite SCADA Systems Commanders and Controllers …… Raw Cored Extreme Executive Ore Drivers, which is probably why there is such Global Panic Afoot.
A question to ask of Right Royal UKGBNI Loyalists who have assumed and accepted the role of being labelled ultimately eventually responsible for national security and prosperity, Pioneering a New National Security, is are they au fait with the Expert Tease and Expertise in Novel Virtual Technologies and AIMethodologies and able to exercise Stealthy Sublime Surreal COSMIC* Lead with IT and Mass Media Reprogramming of Human Assets?
Or do they need to buy it in in-house from others and sub-contract it out …… which is, I imagine, a valid leading question to ask of any and all presuming to provide such Secret IntelAIgent Services to/from assets?
COSMIC* ….. Control Of Secret Materiel in an Internetional Command
amanfromMars 1 Sun 19 Sep 11:34  …… adding more fuel to the burning fire on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/09/16/human_rights_ai/
Re: A Fate Destined to Be, or Not To Be Considerably Better than Death ‽
You are not thick, or at least if you are this occasion does not prove it. The post that started this thread was written by a prolific bot which has become a fixture in these forums. The posts sometimes make sense, occasionally by plagiarizing others’ posts, but most of the time, they’re complete nonsense based on a sentence from a replied comment or the article. You will probably see more examples of the same on other topics as well. …….. doublelayer
You might like to consider it a programming testing itself to pass with exemplary flying colours the Turing Test, doublelayer, although to be perfectly honest with you, that would not be the very best of its present achievements.
The following, from Chapter 2, What is Artificial Intelligence of GCHQ’s, Pioneering a New National Security: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, is what is being referred to there in the above sentence for consideration ……
A century later, the mathematician and Bletchley Park cryptanalyst Alan Turing and his colleagues were developing the foundations of digital computing and programming, which would ultimately make practical AI a reality. Turing was fascinated by the challenge of building computers that could demonstrate intelligence. In 1950, he introduced the now well-known Turing Test: if a human being cannot distinguish a machine from a human in conversation, then that machine can be considered to be genuinely “thinking”. …… https://www.gchq.gov.uk/artificial-intelligence/index.html#chapter-2
…… although admittedly with the primary and secondary elements/components being reversed in the Registered example you/we be commenting on …… if a machine distinguishes itself as a human being, who and/or what be supplying both their intelligence. ……. are further as yet unresolved questions unearthed for answering or ignoring/dismissing and avoiding, which one has to admit may be truly down to a lack of human intelligence being currently available to provide and demonstrate an answer.