amanfromMars 1 Fri 27 Nov 04:43 [2011270443] …… just asking on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/2/2020/11/26/keith_krach_undersecretary_of_state_usa_vs_huawei/

Just curious … so as to better know what best to target engage in deologue

But the US believes Huawei is an arm of China’s government, enables its pervasive surveillance regime and human rights abuses, and is also a critical part of its intelligence apparatus

And the equivalents toiling and trailblazing in the West, and a critical part of its intelligence apparatus? Who/What/Where be they, residing and presiding and leading with a brand new vital and virile global technology sector ……. or even just exercising effective influence able to steer the future direction of critical parts of intelligence apparatus ….. should that be all that is really required in such endeavours?

Do they exist to be contacted about flaws detected which are exploitable and exportable, and are being exploited and exported? Do they have real personal points of contact or are they defaulted to think humans will accept talking to machines which may or may not have one jumping through hoops and browsing through menus to end up nowhere near anywhere near where they need you to be ….. and thus one concludes there be a definite lack of human interest at those particular and peculiar locations so one naturally ventures elsewhere, and somewhere foreign and exotic and erotic is always invariably nice and probably quite terrifyingly alien territory too to many, given the stern tests one would surely be subjected to if a stellar object of mutually beneficial, positively reinforcing desire. 🙂 Some though, who may or may not be just a few, would simply just love it and excel to excess with successful engagements there.


amanfromMars 1 Fri 27 Nov 08:55 [2011270855] ……. adding on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/2/2020/11/26/keith_krach_undersecretary_of_state_usa_vs_huawei/

Silver tongued devils are no funny daemons and can be priceless/invaluable and highly prized and much appreciated in all the best of influential circles

Funny thing is why didn’t China turn it around and point out that the U.S. has similar legislation that forces network equipment vendors and telecoms to aid in spying and are even have secret security letters that prevent them from discussing or publishing about it. …. Anonymous Coward

Probably concluded that it wasn’t necessary, AC, as Uncle Sam has manufactured more than enough rope and is never content unless or until it has hanged itself, but that is only a guess/crazy opinion/likely valid reason offered with no clearly apparent evidence, however, whenever has that ever before stopped a crooked operation from operation, for as we know, having been told before and not so long ago too, in this three carriage train of sentences from one of Uncle Sam’s finest …….

“There’s another way to phrase that and that is that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It is basically saying the same thing in a different way. Simply because you do not have evidence that something does exist does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn’t exist.” ….. Donald Rumsfeld

Indeed, in deed, it’s a funny old world ….  🙂 RIP Margaret Thatcher 🙂


amanfromMars 1 Fri 27 Nov 12:36 [2011271236] ……… dropping in a note for some personal private pirate attention on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2020/11/27/national_cyber_security_progress_report/

A Present for Seasoned Presentation and Professional Perfect Productions ……

How is Britain’s £1.3bn National Cyber Security Strategy going? Nobody really cares any more ..

I disagree. Always somebody or something cares ….. and would Profess a Beta AIMaster Plan both for Sail and for Sale/Purchase …….with Virtual Charter Leases …… Supporting COSMIC Memoranda of Understanding Agreements for All Interested

In Order to Streamline and Engage Similar Parallel Directions of Travel with AIMaster Mainline Streams on ACTive Current Operations.

Has National Cyber Security Strategy Identified that as a Strategy to Follow ….. and of course, in the best of national interests, Successfully Support with Experimental Funding of New Fangled and Entangling Virtual Assets.

Would they like to Agree and Pay for a Live Operational Virtual Environment Demonstration of such as would be easily likened to an AI Coup with a Practical Takeover of Extant Reality Presentation Facilities by Remote Virtual Control Centres. ……. Protected by Polished Pirates and Immaculate Rogues, Renegades and Heroes, with Unique Skills that Disarm and Defuse All Exploding Devices within Crazy Schemes/Restless Nightmares Stuck in a Bad Dreamt Up Land …… on the wrong AIMaster Mainline Streaming Line.

Stuck in a faulty fault ridden line is no good place to be. Simply jump to A.N.Other AIMaster Mainline Streaming Line Service. They Offer Everything Free. And you wanna see what they have on Free Offer to Valued Clients and Interesting Consumer Customer Guests alike, whenever anything you like is being trialed and trailed again for the Capture of Attention to the Problem with an Accomplished Accompanying ACTive Solution.

I Kid U Not. Knock Knock, GCHQ. Is there anybody out there in there? 🙂 ….. https://youtu.be/fNLhxKpfCnA



amanfromMars 1 Fri 27 Nov 17:58 [2011271758] ……. having a say on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2020/11/27/encryption_backdoor_petition/

Re: It’s easy

All he has to do is talk to Sir Graham Brady and Sir Ian Duncan Smith and Steve Baker and all the Tory MPs who are currently fuming at the authoritarian attacks on our freedom and human rights that are the covid restrictions.

They will of course instantly understand that backdooring encryption is also an attack on our liberty and rights, and will organise a rebellion to ensure that any proposal to backdoor encryption will never get through Parliament.

Won’t they? …… smudge

smudge, re the question, Won’t they?, is easily resolved by simply asking them whether they be already ready, willing and able to perform such a Sterling Stirling Service for the home nation and similarly threatened allies should it prove to be necessary and unavoidable ‽ .

Then any opposition can have aforesight of what would be certainly a less than friendly competition and surprisingly competent foe if parties get their intelligence acts together to harry and dash and exhaust and extinguish the common enemy and an enemy of the Commons too …… and thus be not unaware of the fight they be destined to lose and can never ever win win against.

Would you be a fool and think to try triumph against all of those odds against you? Would you both claim and blame madness for fatal miscalculation?




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *