220221

220221

amanfromMars 1 Mon 21 Feb 07:54 [2202210754] ….. https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/02/21/doj_cyber_offensive_policy/

Re: that extension to a modern adaptation of a very old law enforcement technique

Following all the new criminals’ money leads one naturally, indirectly straight to the DoJ and its supporting agencies and US cyber commands.

As strange as it may be, that appears to support another old adage …… If you can’t beat them, join them …… which is not really a solution from anything proposed and presented and funded to be an effective opposition.

—-

amanfromMars 1 Mon 21 Feb 09:54 [2202210954] …… adds on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/02/21/doj_cyber_offensive_policy/

Re: No, no, no

You say that like anyone’s giving anything to them. It’s more like a statement of intent: “We are going to do this.” …. Kane

To not think and realise such things are already and have for some long time been going on is to admit that one hasn’t a clue about what is remotely shaping the future of your existence.

And that makes things so much easier to do ….. and why there is that plan to try and further control and/or shut down other than mainstream traditional information and conventional existing elite intelligence servers.

However, whenever those are failing to deliver the truth, preferring instead to favour fake news in support of outdated and corrupted views, is failure both practically and virtually guaranteed …. and also guaranteed to highlight the problem parties responsible and trying desperately to avoid accountability. IT is a lose lose methodology … and gravely to be regarded and best totally negated.

………………………………..

amanfromMars
February 21, 2022 at 12:50 ….. replying to a decision [Off Topic] which removed a post from further wider viewing commenting on https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2022/02/cry-havoc-and-let-slip-the-dogs-of-war/

Something quite definitely worthy of being topical then, MOD …… given both the perilous and parlous states of mass media communications/traditional conventional news channels?

……………………………………..

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

9 − nine =