140619

140619

amanfromMars 1 Wed 18 Jun 18:45 [1406181845] commenting on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/06/18/assange_lawyers_submit_request_to_sweden_to_remove_detention_decision/
Met Plod Plodding a Crooked Furrow with a Nice Cushy Earner … Well, it aint dangerous, is it*?
Jeremy Paxman teases out of Conrad Black, a most unwholesome picture of US justice, which is not an altogether unexpected great match for its criminal protection and proaction services? Check it out …… http://youtu.be/hBI35DMHjy4?t=5m52s
And what is one to think of governments which choose to be joined at the hip to such as would be an abomination and perversion of a prosecution service and colluding executive administration, knowing that they know it is corrupt and mightily self-serving of a just a chosen few with nothing of novel and noble note to offer?
* Unless boredom can be life-threatening.

—-

amanfromMars 1 Wed 18 Jun 20:33 [1406182033] adding more on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/06/18/assange_lawyers_submit_request_to_sweden_to_remove_detention_decision/

Re: Met Plod Plodding a Crooked Furrow with a Nice Cushy Earner … Well, it aint dangerous, is it*?

Oh, but wait … ! It involves Merikin national security secrets! Sorry, but that’s a secret court, secret evidence, secret verdict, secret imprisonment and permanently sealed records. Bye-bye boy-o! T’was nice knowin’ ye! …. Gray

Regarding national security secrets of any group of co-conspirators/executive administrators, Gray, here be a real world view which it is virtually impossible to maintain and safeguard against self-incrimination and dirty secrets discovery nowadays, for of course are things fundamentally different today and the ways of the past are a crooked history best swept under the carpet of bad memory ……

The defining characteristic of the Bush II/Obama administrations is the reliance on secrecy–not to protect “national security” but to avoid accountability. If the operation is secret, its failure can be safely buried. This is the reason why everything is classified in the Bush II/Obama administrations: transparency and public knowledge are anathema because they enable scrutiny and analysis and eventually, accountability.

Secrecy is all about avoiding accountability. “National security” is the facade.

Secrecy is the refuge of every dictatorship, totalitarian regime and fascist junta on the planet. We need only look at the savage response of the Obama administration to whistleblowers who have risked their careers and livelihoods, not to mention their freedom, to expose the most egregious violations of the Constitution and American values to see just how dependent the Obama administration is on secrecy to avoid accountability.

Bush II was no better: using proxies (private contractors, local militia, etc.) has a long history in the U.S. Imperial Project as a way of avoiding accountability and scrutiny, but the Bush II/Obama foreign policy is totally dependent on proxies of one kind or another (consider the explosive rise in the use of killer drones, Obama’s favored proxy).

The real world is not as forgiving as a bought-and-paid-for media; blowback takes many forms. The incoherence of the Bush II/Obama administrations is not only reaping horrendous harvests in the playgrounds of their Imperial ambitions, it is eroding the American public’s trust in their government and the institutions that claim to protect them in a dangerous world. …. ZeroHedge

PS … nice post by the way, Gray. I just love that sort of humour.:-)

……………………………………………………
HonourableMember …. 19 June 2014 6:02am … having a say on http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/18/government-surveillance-watchdog-loopholes
What are GCHQ protecting and is it basically indefensible because it is decidedly and designedly inequitable and currently servering an intellectually challenged and grand sub-prime ministerial master, which isn’t servering intelligence and which would then also be GCHQ not servering intelligence either?
The following is appropriate here, and most probably whenever possibly honest and presently true, also classifiable as an APT ACT, such is the nature of things and the internetworking of such things today.

amanfromMars 1 Wed 18 Jun 20:33 [1406182033] adding more on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/06/18/assange_lawyers_submit_request_to_sweden_to_remove_detention_decision/

Re: Met Plod Plodding a Crooked Furrow with a Nice Cushy Earner … Well, it aint dangerous, is it*?

Oh, but wait … ! It involves Merikin national security secrets! Sorry, but that’s a secret court, secret evidence, secret verdict, secret imprisonment and permanently sealed records. Bye-bye boy-o! T’was nice knowin’ ye! …. Gray

Regarding national security secrets of any group of co-conspirators/executive administrators, Gray, here be a real world view which it is virtually impossible to maintain and safeguard against self-incrimination and dirty secrets discovery nowadays, for of course are things fundamentally different today and the ways of the past are a crooked history best swept under the carpet of bad memory ……

The defining characteristic of the Bush II/Obama administrations is the reliance on secrecy–not to protect “national security” but to avoid accountability. If the operation is secret, its failure can be safely buried. This is the reason why everything is classified in the Bush II/Obama administrations: transparency and public knowledge are anathema because they enable scrutiny and analysis and eventually, accountability.

Secrecy is all about avoiding accountability. “National security” is the facade.

Secrecy is the refuge of every dictatorship, totalitarian regime and fascist junta on the planet. We need only look at the savage response of the Obama administration to whistleblowers who have risked their careers and livelihoods, not to mention their freedom, to expose the most egregious violations of the Constitution and American values to see just how dependent the Obama administration is on secrecy to avoid accountability.

Bush II was no better: using proxies (private contractors, local militia, etc.) has a long history in the U.S. Imperial Project as a way of avoiding accountability and scrutiny, but the Bush II/Obama foreign policy is totally dependent on proxies of one kind or another (consider the explosive rise in the use of killer drones, Obama’s favored proxy).

The real world is not as forgiving as a bought-and-paid-for media; blowback takes many forms. The incoherence of the Bush II/Obama administrations is not only reaping horrendous harvests in the playgrounds of their Imperial ambitions, it is eroding the American public’s trust in their government and the institutions that claim to protect them in a dangerous world. …. ZeroHedge

PS … nice post by the way, Gray. I just love that sort of humour.:-)

[Still in pre-moderation and virtual exile here, Guardian. Go on, live a little and let the dog see the hare and let things run as they are intended. You know what they say ….. Who dares, win wins ]
[Your comment has been posted but is not yet visible on the site. Please check back shortly.]

—-

HonourableMember … 19 June 2014 6:57am … adding more on http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/18/government-surveillance-watchdog-loopholes

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The only realistic choice that you yourselves do not have to make yourselves, is to get used to the new actuality which has that which seeks to deliver power and command and control seeking to know what everyone is doing and more importantly, proposing to do, so that everything can be suitably prepared. Well, that is the Master Plan, and I leave it up to you yourself to decide and judge how successful you consider it to be in implementation.

Suitably prepared for what and/or for whom is most probably deemed classified TS/SCI and only for that and/or those with a valid need to know, or for that and/or those successfully hacking into systems and breaking formerly thought impenetrable and unbreakable codes.

You are but as pawns and minnows in a Great Game of Olympian Chess within a See of Basqueing Sharks. 🙂 Poe’s Law* Rules and Regulations are Arbitrary and not Mandatory.:-)

* … Poe’s law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that without a clear indication of the author’s intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.

[Your comment has been posted but is not yet visible on the site. Please check back shortly.]

…………………………………………….

amanfromMars said… congratulating Casey E on http://amanfrommars.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/140618.html

Anyhow they asked where I had lived, who I reported this technology to, and asked me (not word for word) “if this technology exists, why haven’t the geeks at the FBI have it figured out” … Casey E 18 June 2014 22:48

Did you find it difficult to not offer that they be probably too busy at the FBI not figuring things out, Casey?
And Anonymous who posted a reply to you, 19 June 2014 04:46, share a widely held perception of a current situation and likely future possibility, …….Prosecutors do not acknowledge nuance, CE… Have you received an invitation to join their club? …. which would be considered by some, who may be more than just a few and many to be something of a positive opportunity ….. which it most probably very well can be.
Methinks though it be a naive folly to expect anything significant and worthwhile to be likely happening, in any novel and disruptively creative field, in any way too fast for traditional and/or conventional status quo type systems to try and grab a command and control handle. There be lots of palms to grease and minds to rattle and positions to secure against mortal/vital damage because of pre-existing arrangements and programs and projects which be in danger of being extraordinarily rendered toxic and totally unnecessary, for future delivery of Virtual Reality Productions with Media and IT Direction of Programming Product and Global Operating Device Programmed and Programmable Projects, to be widely freely acknowledged and trumpeted as being readily available for Operating Systems Use.
19 June 2014 09:00
…………………………………………………….
amanfromMars 1 Thu 19 Jun 13:02 [1406191302] giving IT some wellie on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/2/2014/06/18/assange_lawyers_submit_request_to_sweden_to_remove_detention_decision/
Cost effective …. in the way of a hooker or cuckold

Why bother spending more money on this guy than you would some other bail jumper in the UK, cut the police presence to that normally found out and around an embassy. Its not as if he will abscond from his comfy prison – after all should he get out he is likely to be picked by the black-helicopter crowd.

If he succeded in leaving the UK then good not our problem anymore … Lostyearsago

Quite so, Lostyearsago. One does wonder why Blighty does as she’s told by foreign parties rather than doing her own constructively unique thing. No longer the home of the brave of heart and the true of spirit is that which she represents nowadays and that is a shame which the City and Westminster is to shoulder the blame for, for the ignorant population are too stupid to know anything at all about any of those sort of dodgy games and therefore are as innocents and dumb paying spectators to the media hosted pantomimes that pass themselves off as competing realities.
……………………………………………………..
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 − 2 =