>110714

>110714

>The Gospel and World according to IntelAIgents and Media Manipulation of Information …

Posted Thursday 14th July 2011 06:55 GMT

….. for Present Dysfunctional Viewing and Future Virtual Reality Product Placement*.

unlike the US, the Chinese WILL engage in extreme rendition or targeted assassination if you hack their military.” ….. Tom 13 Posted Wednesday 13th July 2011 12:57 GMT

You might like to completely rethink that ethical white knight view of Uncle Sam should you be persuaded that the following tale is more true to life and reality than pure fantasy, Tom 13 …… http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_ops_insiders_234.html

* Future Virtual Reality Product Placement is the New Base Discipline to be Remotely Anonymously Mastered for the petty but real enough illusion of Absolute Control in Live Operational Virtual Environments …..[…”also referred to in milspeak as spectrum dominance.” ? …… http://cryptome.org/eyeball/dod-cyberwar/dod-cyberwar.htm ]

IT is a Virtual Head Space Place in which the threatening wielding of deadly and destructive weapons identifies the sad and bad and mad losers to rad and fab winners. ITs fools and tools never ever ascend its Power Control Ranks of Commendable Command.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/07/12/anonymous_leaks_military_email_addresses/
…………………………………………………………………………

Softly Softly …….AIMen at Work in REST for Play

Thursday 14th July 2011 08:47 GMT   

Hi, Fred Flintstone,

Regarding your post, “I’m getting *very* tired of this..” … Posted Wednesday 13th July 2011 18:11 GMT …. You appear to be calling for and lamenting the non-utilisation of a new clearer and NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive IT ……. which easily addresses and solves all of the problems you cite ….. and would equally easily also decimate the full catalogue of a host of other problems, unmentioned and unmentionable, too.

I second that call and would provide virtual facility and utility of ISPv2 ….. which would now really be a highly classified test of the present state of Advanced Intelligence and CyberIntelAIgent Analysis and of the current global levels of Future Virtual Intelligence in the myriad competitive Secret Intelligence Services and SMARTer Intelligent Communities which task themselves with National and International and InterNetional Security ProVision too.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/07/13/interception_modernisation_returns/
…………………………………………………………………………

I think it’s a more AIDefinitive BIOS problem in Operating Systems without 42Feed

Thursday 14th July 2011 08:06 GMT
 
I think it’s an OS problem:

ERROR! INPUT: amanfromMars 1 Well, well, well…

OUT OF CHEESE ERROR.” ….. nyelvmark Posted Wednesday 13th July 2011 22:50 GMT

Hi, nyelvmark,

Did you really mean to say … OUT OF GCHEESE ERROR …. to draw fit and proper attention to their [GCHQ and Google] mistakes/missteps.

On that we can surely agree that a new seed is necessary for to feed.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/07/13/interception_modernisation_returns/
…………………………………………………………………………

A Valid Question of Heads of Intelligence Anywhere and Everywhere, as well as of Any There in GCHQ

Posted Thursday 14th July 2011 10:23 GMT  

Hmmm … http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8635959/Whizz-kids-deserting-the-spy-world-as-threat-of-attacks-increases.html

Proof positive that Intelligence Service ProVision is absent in the Doughnut …… for leading intelligence is a priceless commodity where lack of money is never an issue because IT can so effortlessly collapse and reconfigure/reconstitute dodgy and DODGI AIMODified Systems and renders currency just printed paper for selfless distribution to those who make ProVision for ITs Sublime IntelAIgent Services. The Great British Shame would seem to be that it is not presently catered for, to make and take advantage of the every benefit that such freedom offers. It is though a relatively minor issue in a major exercise and but only a simple decision away from being reversed and resolved with the novel introduction of a Ab Fab Program which captures the attention of struggling and collapsing markets.

Is GCHQ capable of such lead or is it a pale imitation of what it should be under its present sub-prime command and missing programs?

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/07/13/interception_modernisation_returns/
…………………………………………………………………………

Bernanke Bursts the Gold Bubble? …. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YGK5z2LBn7k 

…………………………………………………………………………

Second Class Service does not entertain First Class Travel?

Posted Thursday 14th July 2011 17:25 GMT   

Maybe … It’s not just the salary, but also the embarrassment of working for someone who can say “”I need some real internet whizzes in order to do cyber” with a straight face.” …. JustaKOS Posted Thursday 14th July 2011 15:33 GMT

Be that as it may be, JustaKOS, but that is exactly what is needed, and anything less is an epic fail with Blighty always on the back foot and responding to foreign generated events rather than leading in anything the wizards would be seeding/feeding.

That is the UK’s problem ….. it leads in diddly squat. And just you try and present them with that which they really would need to lead in cyber, and see what happens/where it takes you. Who would you send an email to, to get a cogent response to what would obviously be a very sensitive proposal indeed. Indeed, so sensitive that really one shouldn’t be sending it by any electronic means at all, given that all communications are monitored. Or we are led to believe that it is so, although that could be a convenient myth.

I imagine one needs to share such thoughts in tongues/steganographic code with as tempting a live bait as one may consider may create some smart reaction and engagement from the service aiming to be top dog in that field.

It can be the case that some things will be beyond the ken of a nation and one may be obliged to venture elsewhere.

Is anyone betting on GCHQ monitoring this registering thread? 🙂 ……. Smile, say cheese, 🙂 All of your plans belong to us, is the wager …..
…?

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/07/14/gchq_microsoft_google/
…………………………………………………………………………

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

nineteen + 12 =