>Big Brother Controls aint Heavy in Heady Brigade Operations …..

Posted Tuesday 24th May 2011 04:53 GMT

… although in Perfect Tempestuous Storms can they be Constructively Destructively Disruptive when Necessary and/or Unwisely Selfishly Opposed

“Question: Is control controlled by its need to control?

Answer: yes” ….. Frumious Bandersnatch Posted Monday 23rd May 2011 22:28 GMT

Hmmm? Others, Frumious Bandersnatch, with a much more practical hands on, get down and boogey, HyperRadioProActive bent would, whilst not disagreeing with any need to control, realise that the primary factor for power is superlative feed to control.

And then the only really important question shifts to consideration of to what, and that will always default to, to whom does one supply that superlative feed, if one has decided to assist present effete elite arrangements rather than considering a whole new ball game with supply to a ready willing and enabled renegade rogue with a mind to provide hope and change and give peace a chance to change the world beyond all present recognition.

Would anyone care to register an opinion on who that might be because of what they may head or what they may have which would be helpful and make things oh so easy?

Of course, if one were to supply a number of such players with the same sophisticated coherent internetworking feed, would the program be greatly enhanced and much more quickly embedded to ensure and guarantee it as, …………. well, it would surely be an Astute NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive IT AIDefault New Virtual World Order System for Really SMART Players.

Oh, and William S. Burroughs [Ah Pook] was a real barrel of laughs, wasn’t he, although hardly surprising whenever one considers the personal battles he undertook with himself …… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Burroughs

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/05/23/adam_curtis_machines_interview/

………………………………………………………………………..