111129

111129

SMART Comment required for Future Systems Analyst Analysis … ….. http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/11/28/intel_xeon_e5_sas_bug/
Posted Tuesday 29th November 2011 04:10 GMT
…… thus 42 Gauge Present Current State of ARG Play with Programmer Pilots Providing Driver Potential and Protocols in Simply Complex Lead Promotions in AI Projects with Creative Civil CyberSpace Contractors …. SMART Future Builders.

If there is a bug in the SAS controller implemented in the Patsburg chipset when used in conjunction with the Xeon E5s, by delaying the manufacturing and launch of the chipsets and boards, Intel could keep its books from being hit a second time by the SAS bug.

And what do y’all imagine that tells the SAS controller of the efficacy of the bug methodology and about the quantum gates that IT controls and powers with them drivering in virtualised systems?
And that is said and shared as perfectly as it needs to be, for those in that particular and peculiar know who would think they have a clearance that provides all that is needed to be known, for it shares and says everything that needs to be shared and said about what has been done and cannot be undone ……. and rather than being just a temporary glitch to hold up progress is rather more an abiding stealthy security services facility that mentors and monitors AI ProgramMING and Enigmatic Anomalous Phorming of Advanced Persistent Threats in IT for SMART Media Presentation with Future Protection.
Who/What do you think tests Processors and Chipsets and Motherboards and Systems and Global Computerised Networks for Future FailSafe Secure InterNetworking Services with CodeD Cloud Control Layers? And please, let’s get and keep it real here …. no alien quips without backup to prove the assertion beyond any shadow of doubt, ok?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
amanfromMars ….. on http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/?p=331
Please Note: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Hi, Pierluigi Paganini/John,
Access to information is one thing, and as has been documented, is an easy technological feat. Processing and using it intelligently and anonymously, for stealthy and failsafe secure protection of core intelligence sources, is an altogether quite fundamentally different matter.
And any who can provide that service, and they may be as rare as hens’ teeth, are in that classification of program funded by an open blank cheque and magic plastic debit card drawing on an account with always limitless resources and mountains of flash cash for spending available ……. they are the whatever it takes yin providers that are needed to counteract and balance and save the asses of those too big to fail takers, suitably humbled in the spectacular failure of their collapsed debt creation meme.
Some, and there may even be many of those too big to fail takers, may prove themselves to be too arrogant and ignorant and thus unworthy of being saved. So be it. They are no great loss and the system will assimilate and redistribute the then liberated assets.
It has always been that way, since before even time began, methinks. Intelligence Rules Sublimely with Powerful Reins in Reigns of Hearts and Minds Control. And if it wasn’t in yore, then is it in the future and now.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Please correct if misleading and not right, for anything else would be wrong …… http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/11/28/assange_journalist/
Posted Tuesday 29th November 2011 09:30 GMT

When the US constitution granted special protections to journalists, it failed to define what exactly the job meant, nor to specify a test or establish a register to prove one’s eligibility for those protections.

That’s partly because *there are no special protections for journalists*. The constitution guarantees “freedom […] of the press”. It makes absolutely no difference whether “the press” in question is run by a journalist, a politician or a baker. Indeed, it’s pretty clear that any such rules would be unconstitutional.

So the whole “is he/isn’t he a journalist?” question, from the US legal standpoint, makes not the slightest bit of difference to anything.” ….. veti Posted Tuesday 29th November 2011 03:47 GMT

Morning, veti,
The US constitution is surely apparently, no more than just a scrap of useless script nowadays, veti, to be used and abused in a Great Game Deceit, by any perversely rich tool and old fool Tom, Dick or Barry, in a pantomime of a democratic administrative executive office, and as is clearly evidenced with The Plain Truth here ……http://youtu.be/dX41SkKN0tQ
And that doesn’t bode well for the Land of the Free No More, MeThinks.
I am reminded of General Custer’s last words …. “Injuns? What Injuns?” and of something Einstein is supposed to have said with regard to infinity …. “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Posted by amanfromMars on 11/29/11 05:03 AM …. http://thedailybell.com/bellinclude.cfm?id=3295

The average non-investor should seek to EDUCATE himself or herself about the markets as best as possible and then make decisions accordingly (based on his life-situation, family needs, etc.) Not rocket science in other words. But most people right now don’t even understand the society they live in” … . Reply from The Daily Bell

I quite agree, DB, but the markets are not without their crooked difficulties and conspiring perils, as can probably be well confirmed and attested to, with the benefit of hindsight and experience, by Anthony [Wile], Executive Director of The Foundation for the Advancement of Free-Market Thinking (FAFMT) and the Chief Editor of The Daily Bell.
It is not an arena for anyone who would be playing by any set of limiting rules with thoughts of regulation. Be warned that it is, along with IT, an extremely HyperRadioProActive and Hostile Environment which cares not a jot about you and yours or theirs, in crazy pursuit of everything ignorant and arrogant that is to be ours?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Posted by amanfromMars on 11/29/11 08:05 AM …. http://thedailybell.com/3295/Robespierres-War-on-Terror
Ref Reply from The Daily Bell to Posted by amanfromMars on 11/29/11 05:03 AM
I quite categorically do not believe, and where did that crazy notion come from, DB, that the likes of Barney Frank and Nancy Peolosi ought to be determining how the markets operate. They are just not any near smart enough to think of the much bigger picture. Surely their “job” is to maintain the existing system rather than throw it into the trash and pioneer a new one with completely new libertarian protocols which deliver currency for spending rather than collection for the artificial power of what is ponzi wealth. And you know that makes sense.
And have you ever tried to have a direct chat with a closed system of neo-fascist conservative federalism/capitalist mercantilism? Methinks not. And have you noticed that they avoid like the plague getting involved in conversation and dialogue on these free and transparent virtual forums. And it doesn’t take one to be an Einstein to understand the reasoning for that ….. which are their old ideas and policies would not stand up to forensic scrutiny and exposure to the realities on the ground and as delivered to them by forces beyond their control in cyberspace.
And if you are really lucky, the state and the Fed will adopt your ideas and force everyone to live by them.
This will gratify you.” …… Oh please, to force anyone to do anything is to gratify a fools’ tool and surely you would not be implying that is a solution for anything. I certainly wouldn’t even dream of it. Indeed, it is probably correct to say that such a forcing of ideas on folk and a tax on their endeavours are at the root cause of most of that which is sub-prime toxic and poisoning the system.
The bottom line is that the existing global system of fiat currency control for power, as it is presently administered, is rumbled/hacked, with the necessary general and specific ignorance of the politically controlled and brainwashed masses, which was vital to allow it to work, being no longer available, and it is the height of madness to not imagine the clear and present imminent danger to those who would be responsible for the maintenance and retention of a now fully compromised and unfit for future purpose system. Their future survival in control of power systems depends upon them piloting/funding a novel alternate program which can seamlessly take over from the current debt creation one.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
An Almighty Offer, Bruce, surely secures Enigmatically, Nascent Nodes with Colossal Potential ….. http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/11/29/bruce_schneier_cyber_war_hype/
Posted Tuesday 29th November 2011 15:12 GMT

At a national level, Schneier also endorsed an idea from former US cyber-czar Richard Clark, who has proposed cyber treaties between countries that would outline certain agreements, for example no first use of weapons or no attacks against civilian infrastructure.

At the immediate practical level would there be a more virtually guaranteed order in an easily engineered and invisible remote controlled chaos, if cyber retainers between countries and competent non state actor persons of interest into remote invisible controlled chaos engineering, were mutually agreed upon to prevent, for example, non attributable use of virtualised weaponry against any and/or all command and control systems/zeroday vulnerability exploit targets …… although one does have to mention that such is quite a tall order whenever one is aware of the fabulous riches and outrageous fortunes which are so readily available to both incompetent and/or unknowledgeable sponsors and star players in such security fields, which in military and paramilitary speak would be irregular and unconventional virtual team terrain, most definitely.
It is an interesting point to consider, whenever one would be engaged in or entertained by such shenanigans as produce such a situation which has one availed of and capable of distributing abilities and facilities that are of a valuable trading nature, whether one’s Internet Service Provider [the first and last link in the virtual communications chain] would be best placed to take the initiative and make a perfectly acceptable offer that would be ideally, mutually beneficial to all, which of course it would be quite naturally, whenever all parties , whether public or private or pirate were smart and way out ahead of the Great Game, Pioneering Virtual Lead Infrastructure and Future Protocols for 21st Century Cloud Networks InterNetworking Joint Applications.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Posted by amanfromMars on 11/29/11 12:51 PM …. on http://thedailybell.com/bellinclude.cfm?id=3295
Is jail just too good for crooks in zoot suits? … … http://www.zerohedge.com/news/hank-paulson-tipped-goldman-led-plunge-protection-team-about-fannie-bankruptcy-7-weeks-advance … .. or are we to believe that there was no crime committed?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Eeeny, meeny, miney, mo ….. Gamekeeper or Poacher*, that is the question? ….. http://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/submit/2011/11/29/bruce_schneier_cyber_war_hype/
Posted Tuesday 29th November 2011 18:33 GMT

Until Bruce Schneier can explain that gross malfeasance by his boss I will struggle to understand why BT Directors believe they are in a position to lecture anyone about online security threats” ….. dephormation.org.uk Posted Tuesday 29th November 2011 17:11 GMT

Well, one thing is pretty certain, deformation.org.uk, you are not qualified to lecture anyone about online security threats unless you able to successfully carry them out.
* 🙂 There are other extremely lucrative options, with the smartest ones invariably revolving around being both Yin and Yang and playing one side off against the other and providing options and solutions to the problems one would be causing by proxy, although of course would they be pseudo-solutions to generate more problems for similar solving. And a nice little earner is that …. like selling weapons to nations you are going to invade, so that weapons and nations can be destroyed for rebuilding and resupply to the same early sub-prime standard as before, so that the same thing can be tried again later in the future.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

three × five =