>100328

>100328

>

    Perhaps the best solution for dual medium news agencies is produce two different products – a traditional print newspaper & an online service – perhaps with shorter, snappier articles (blogs?), more interaction, that provides more up-to-date news? …. Mack @ 09:46 PM

Mack,

What you discover whenever more interaction, that provides more up-to-date news is enabled, is that should the interaction contain mutually beneficial peaceful views [and therefore not be popularly subject to any legitimate or rightful moral universal condemnation and dismissal], which would also be able to provide the necessary ways and means to achieve those views,…….  and which are easily able to lead in a direction contrary to the view/wishes of the site/paper owner or the national/international/Internetional interest of the jurisdiction and executive administration which would be favouring and supporting and using/abusing a media mogul with newspapers [and media] to lead/subliminally program readers and viewers, …… is that failing to be able to counter those views reasonably with valid argument will either result in those novel interactive views from contributors being denied publication for global viewing [which is the audience available for anything which is virtual/online] or if that is not practically possible, then is the site denied Internet hosting or the site owners decide to ensure that an introduced increasingly critical moderation will decide on which contributions to “print” …..ie Censorship will Increase dramatically and nowadays, because of the ubiquitous and instant nature of Global Virtual Telecommunications Delivery Systems, does the Host Nation descend into a Fermenting and Fomenting State of Indignant Anarchy and Fascist Authoritarian Control, which isn’t Control at all, but rather an Ignorant Abuse of Power.

Does the following describe any united kingdom/states that you may know and recognise all too well …… A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. – Alexander Fraser Tytler, 18th century Historian and Jurist

And this, is a fact ……”And here is some news which you may not know …… Whenever the Great Debate message board was on the BBC, news items freely and openly discussed by its members, and some of them were real smart, towards an acceptable consensus of constructive unbiased opinion, invariably ended up as an item of news and novel government policy a day or two later, pirated/plagiarised from the board. Sadly though, nowadays, after a number of drastic changes to curb the critical free speech against the rules and regulations of Puppets and Muppets in the madhouse of Westminster, the very few boards that remain are moderated to such a ridiculous extent in support of the BBC/government view, as to be a complete and utter waste of anyone’s time and Public money.” ………. which is irrefutable evidence in support of the fact.

And with regard to From that time on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury,…. which was written a long time ago and things have moved on considerably since then, it is NOT the majority which votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, it is a very small elite/cabal, for the present sorry state of Great Game play and Power Perception is Public Apathy Enables Leaders To Ignore Voters. . . and that is something which Leads Perverse and Subversive Thinking for Political and Military Action, as is revealed in this most recent CIA Document [11 March 2010] …. http://file.wikileaks.org/file/cia-afghanistan.pdf.

And who here on Slugger think that politicians and governments listen to voters?

I bet you a pound to a penny more voters will say that their views are ignored and they just do what they want.

Posted by amanfromMars on Mar 28, 2010 @ 09:16 AM

http://sluggerotoole.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the-economics-of-online-news/…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Posted by: amanfromMars | 03/28/10 | 1:21 am |

How long before the enemy you create with wars and killings, realise that targeting politicians and bankers will end them creating and financing wars and killings?

And “you” in this context means anyone who thinks that wars and killings are a solution or necessity to achieve their goals, for such thoughts belong to the feeble minded,intellectually bankrupt and sociopathic/psychopathically psychotic.

Crazily enough, that more targeted realisation, to induce greater thought and actions which result in solutions other than wars and killings, requires a very similar mindset as would think them necessary, except one tends to create lifelong, bitter and ever stronger enemies whilst the other is intelligently designed to create and strengthen friendships lifelong.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/03/drone-attacks-legit-self-defense-says-administration-lawyer/
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

amanfromMars  said…

    Robert,

    Do you know who provides the Prince and Monaco with their Leading Intelligence now …… or is it a Situation Vacant?

    Certainly there is no evidence of it being provided in any Field, although of course, that is the sort of knack which can also suggest that they are presently very well catered for and adequately provided.

    March 28, 2010 12:19 AM

http://sbinvestigator.blogspot.com/2010/03/sunday-funnies_27.html
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

 Re: Force for good – especially for Afghan children
amanfrommars wrote:
Sunday, 28 March 2010 at 05:12 pm (UTC)

Spin/Propaganda in war zones is an art form practiced by many, fin_d_empire_v ……. http://file.wikileaks.org/file/cia-afghanistan.pdf …… and abuse of children is a problem for the Vatican state too.

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-our-forces-for-good-must-bow-out-1929216.html
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    The Northern Ireland Assembly prepared last night to order an official investigation into child abuse in the Province after details emerged of more attacks on children by membe
rs of the clergy. The inquiry would be similar to that which uncovered a shocking litany of historic crimes in the Republic of Ireland last year. An official investigation is expected to cost up to £40 million and take no longer than five years.

FFS….. what’s to investigate? The crimes are admitted/confessed to. And official investigations invariably are used to cover up and hide abuses in office rather than clean out the stables but they do provide rich easy pickings for investigative team members and opportunities to charge/fleece/launder Public money into private hands.

A much better idea for the Northern Ireland Assembly, rather than wasting £40 million on looking into something which every man and dog on the street knows, is to build a new flash prison to house all the perverts and criminals being moved around in the paedophile rings, unless you want them lurking free in secluded places contemplating/reminiscing on their deeds, although you’ll have a hell of a job selling that as a good idea to the abused and the Public. And how very odd that the Vatican chose that route whenever it is such a destructive and rotten See.

And how very strange that there’s never enough money for the normal things in life but shedloads of it for everything else? Which all goes to suggest that it is a massive con and just a simple means of controlling the ignorant masses with poverty/lack of cash to spend.

Posted by amanfromMars on Mar 28, 2010 @ 05:50 PM

http://sluggerotoole.com/index.php/weblog/comments/brady-to-be-vaticans-sacrifical-lamb/
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

three × 1 =