amanfromMars 1 Sat 18 Feb 06:52 [2302180652] …… presents a presumptuous assumptive proposal for extremely prejudicial action against troublesome executive office personnel on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2023/02/17/military_ai_summit/

Did you not get the NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTive ParaMilitary AIMemo?

Wars and any special military type operations are to be banned. All those who call for them and support/defend them as necessary in the future, are AITargeted with all manner and means at societies disposal for liquidation at the earliest convenient moment. Take care not to test.

Man’s Major Inhumanity to Man Problem Solved …… in 287 characters …… and a pretty accurate assessment of what AI thinks nations destroying worlds need to be made fully aware of as they ponder establishment of a Global Commission on AI that will raise awareness of how AI can and should be used in the military domain, and how such tech can be developed and deployed responsibly.

Who Dares IT Wins the Penalty Prize for Bellicosity, Assured Imminent Death.

—-

amanfromMars 1 Sat 18 Feb 10:03 [2302181003] ….. adds more info for intel and über peer review debate on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2023/02/17/military_ai_summit/

Re: AI won’t be the end of civilisation as we know it.

What makes you think that AI is not hubris driven, short sighted idiocy? …. Richard 12

Any advance or variation on the answer and fact that there are no idiots in command and control of it/them? And with no blunt fools who/which wannabe sharp tools tolerated or potentially entertained a default fundamental base element requirement/direction/instruction, something novel to build any greater future upon/with ‽

…………………………….