GrahamC  ……. airing an engaging enthusiastic opinion on https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2021/7/8/chess-vs-go—strategic-strength-gamecraft-and-china
“an expanding exercise of non-Western ethical guidelines that both broaden the scope of experimentation and provide justificatory bases for China’s intellectual property laws.”
Those guidelines would be an interesting read, gentlemen [Timothy J. Demy, James Giordano and Gina Granados Palmer]. Would you care to share them so that all supporting National Defense can avail themselves of such as an exotic erotic Eastern advantage.
“Increasing capabilities in AI are such that multi-domain, multi-dimensional and multi-national factors of competitive disposition and exercise of power can be forecasted, and inductive investments in influential domains of capability and power can be engaged and exploited to achieve strategically latent power longevity.”
Quite so, however, increasing capabilities in AI are an known unknown force and source the specific power of which cannot be accurately forecast, other than it is bound to be disruptive and creative with never any degree of certainty or continuity in a particular direction of future travel, and to think that either impossible or improbable and unlikely, will extraordinarily render one stuck in any number of deep and dark ruts to repeat past follies again and again, albeit in a different vein and against myriad phantom new foe of your own imaginative creation ….. and that has one catastrophically disadvantaged against any Great Game Players mindful and cognizant of the fact.
Increasing AI capabilities are Greater IntelAIgent Game Changer, and for SMARTR Players, a devilishly good, heavenly sent opportunity to engage with in making a quantum leaping difference which impacts directly on the nature of future realities/upcoming events for mass multi-media MMORPG hosting.
I Kid U Not.
“The views and opinions expressed in this essay are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Defense Department, U.S. Naval War College, and/or the organizations and institutions funding the authors’ work.”
Methinks ideally, in order to render an internetional advantage, they should be reflective of those of the Defense Department, U.S. Naval War College, and/or the organizations and institutions funding the authors’ work.
[Thank you. Your comment will be displayed soon after reviewing.]
amanfromMars 1 Fri 9 Jul 10:47  ….. just saying on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/07/09/bofh_2021_episode_10/
Box Tickers Anonymous United …….
License terms and conditions are akin to bracelets and baubles and handcuffs restricting free movement and further open discussion and random and/or rogue and/or renegade rapid engagement of novel vulnerabilities subsequently discovered as inequitable and designedly self-serving rather than self-servicing.
Well, they are in secret circles, that’s for sure, surely ‽ . But as Simon says, who bothers even reading them before clicking on a Yes, that’s perfectly ok today box.
amanfromMars 1 Fri 9 Jul 13:59  …… adds on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/07/09/bofh_2021_episode_10/
Re: Box Tickers Anonymous United ……. Fielding FailSafe Security Services
Proper postmen always ring at least twice when delivering advice or seeking deliverance.
That’s an Interesting Door to be answering for AWEsome goodies to Share/Sell/LendLease/Export/Import.
Who Dares Win Wins to Never Ever Again Lose/Fail.
Cheltenham Station X Fare Ware with Advanced IntelAIgent Source and Force Protection.
🙂 Crikey, a Zimmerman Telegram BetaTesting Earthly Resources for Future Worthy Capabilities.