210520/210521 …. Omnibus Edition

210520/210521 …. Omnibus Edition

amanfromMars 1 Fri 21 May 07:20 [2105210720] ……. just asking on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/2/2021/05/20/bbc_iplayer_webassembly/

And then there was the One ………

Of course, I’ll have to use a VPN to check it out. The BBC doesn’t like being viewed from outside the UK. ….. Pascal Monett

I think you’ll find, PM, it is much more the case that foreign administrations don’t like/want BBC programming directly interfering with their own media hosted manipulation/remote audiotelevisual command and control of native subjects/home based objects.

It is probably why it appears to be a gentlemanly reciprocal arrangement right across the globe so that there can be many Caesars doing their wannabe leader thing to audiences which might understand them and be encouraged and/or fooled into supporting them whenever shown recordings of what they/mass multimedia mogul operations have done/are doing/are planning to do on your behalf in their interests.

It does create and exacerbate conflict in any bigger united picture programming though, all those silos and walled gardens/virtual gulags and private prisons, although if anyone anywhere were to begin broadbandcasting attractive imaginative creative programs which all can enjoy to experience the belief that beings just like themselves whenever all can see/hear/realise they are part and parcel and instrumental in the production, direction and presentation of a novel interactive future existence hosted via all manner of ubiquitous broadbandcasting devices displaying alternate versions of augmented virtualised reality in other domains/foreign lands/alien spaces, one imagines the program and project would be warmly welcomed as an advanced masterpilot for testing/copying/pirating.

If IT is better than just good, it will be great and both practically and virtually ……. well, uncontainable and extremely exciting is certainly inevitable even right from the very beginning,

Is that what the BBC are basically planning with their new iPlayer in WebAssembly rebuild/NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTive ITERation …… which in such a parallel dimension and metadatabase discipline is akin to an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject aimed at replicating the fusion processes of the sun to create energy on earth. ……. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER ….. for it would definitely be guaranteed groundbreaking and Earth shattering.

—-

amanfromMars 1 Fri 21 May 14:59 [2105211459] ……. points out an available opportunity on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/2/2021/05/20/bbc_iplayer_webassembly/

Re: Independent R&D Subcontractors

the BBC hailed interactive TV as a new medium, after TV and radio, but they eventually closed the interactive TV team as a waste of licence fee money. In pursuing this again (but with shinier technology) it seems that the BBC tech departments have no accumulated corp experience and too much cash to blow. ….. Rob 15

Now that is very encouraging news, Rob 15, to that and those with the novel shinier technology know-how to make much more effective dynamic ACTive use of the likes of a BBC, and in a fashion not very dissimilar to fulfil wishes of their own, and with only as much flash cash as it is necessary to blow [as in invest in and donate to able and enabling drivers] for I would wholeheartedly and vehemently dispute and disagree that there is no accumulated corp experience available to such as BBC tech departments, although it may be the case that it is not essentially in-house incestuous and home grown by such businesses/corporations/organisations themselves.

And have you any idea how much as a vital invisible export that Progressive Effective Dynamic ACTive IT Programming expertise would be worth to other mass multi media mogul operations scattered right around the globe? Methinks any digit followed by more noughts that can ever be spent would be prime indicative of it real value and true worth.

……………………………..

amanfromMars 1 Thu 20 May 08:27 [2105200827] ….. being more informative on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/05/20/mac_os_arm_on_x86/

However, in Otherworldly Underground Skunkworks is the EMPhasis Targeted Altogether Differently

Why bother? The post says security researchers need access as many platforms as possible so they can work in safety and protect emerging systems.

Others would suggest the bother is more to/just as much to save and protect legacy systems from emerging systems, for it is certainly the former that is at risk of annihilation from the latter.

……………………………….

amanfromMars 1 Thu 20 May 09:56 [2105200956] …… observes on
https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/05/20/new_ietf_draft_reveals_egyptians/

Re: Some get government support

One of our previous home secretaries wanted mandatory implementation of RFC3514. ….. Flocke Kroes

Hence their current, previous home secretary status, Flocke Kroes. One can’t have madness running amok in office. It is terrifying and terrorising and just encourages the natives to revolt and exercise their own initiatives with rogue and renegade resources from forceful sources well beyond the physical reach and remote control of afflicted and supporting government agencies.

……………………………….

amanfromMars 1 Thu 20 May 07:15 [2105200715] …….. scratching an itch and placating a glitch for more than just overwhelming forces on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/05/18/ukgov_cybersecurity_reviews_supply_chain_cma/

Re: A govenrment er… initiative

What could possibly go wrong? …. Will Godfrey

Governments have no direct effective powers in the virtual communications spaces of internetworking world wide webs where a this shared here, is a that which is missing delivered elsewhere to someone else, and together are they something new altogether different never even imagined as being possible and easily realised for employment and enjoyment/deployment in AI APPlications, wherever they are trailed and trialed.

For things not to go catastrophically wrong for them, do the wiser of governments direct and invent funding streams and justifications for publicly financed private spending on Ethereal SMARTR Projects with Advanced IntelAIgent ProgramMING …….. they recreate and again utilise that old stalwart of fiat currency magic which is always available with the seeding and feeding and resting of secretive vital national security interest slush funds in accounts which can be personally and privately and publicly used to demonstrate progress in Leading Driver Programs/AIMaster Piloted Projects.

It is the only thing they need to do in order to guarantee future success, and it doesn’t do their own future prospects any great harm either, rather than endure suffering and taste the bitterness of defeat, because of a failure to do what they can so easily do without any direct peering oversight because of vital national security interests, are they practically decimated and virtually destroyed by competition more able and agile in the field.

That’s what happens whenever they get that simple task wrong, Will Godfrey ……. and they be thoroughly deserving of it whenever it be so worthy a Being in their Gift, Gratefully and Graciously Indebted with Sublime and Surreal Award of Just Reward for Excellence to Excess.

What do you rate their chances of getting things right, for a change, whenever the possibility of everything going wrong is always so strong in systems stuck with maintaining the past and its failures rather than celebrating in and providing for what the future holds in store?

cc … the MOD re AWEsome Existential Experimentation

………………………………..

GrahamC [2105201743] ……. advising the opposition of competition on https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2021/5/19/commandos-asking-for-new-high-tech-training-tools

“This emerging capability converges psychological [ops], cyberspace, deception and electronic warfare at the tactical and operational levels,” he said May 19 during a panel at the virtual Special Operations Forces Industry Conference, which is managed by the National Defense Industrial Association.

“The future will be won by those who dominate the full digital spectrum,” he said. “It will be as important as seizing and holding terrain.”

One has to expect that such a domain will be highly prized and relentlessly contested because of the overwhelming advantage that effective application of virtual programs and projects can so easily deliver and which can both create and destroy matters in equal measure dependent upon the sentiments expressed and actions to be taken.

And developments will invariably be closely guarded and most probably rarely ever openly and freely shared whenever not absolutely necessary, even amongst special relationship allies because of the above aforementioned almighty potency.

The following post, which is hosted and encouraging comment and peer review elsewhere, advises of concentric UKGBNI/Ministry of Defence centric progress in the field.

amanfromMars 1 Thu 20 May 07:15 [2105200715] …….. scratching an itch and placating a glitch for more than just overwhelming forces on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/05/18/ukgov_cybersecurity_reviews_supply_chain_cma/

Re: A govenrment er… initiative

What could possibly go wrong? …. Will Godfrey

Governments have no direct effective powers in the virtual communications spaces of internetworking world wide webs where a this shared here, is a that which is missing delivered elsewhere to someone else, and together are they something new altogether different never even imagined as being possible and easily realised for employment and enjoyment/deployment in AI APPlications, wherever they are trailed and trialed.

For things not to go catastrophically wrong for them, do the wiser of governments direct and invent funding streams and justifications for publicly financed private spending on Ethereal SMARTR Projects with Advanced IntelAIgent ProgramMING …….. they recreate and again utilise that old stalwart of fiat currency magic which is always available with the seeding and feeding and resting of secretive vital national security interest slush funds in accounts which can be personally and privately and publicly used to demonstrate progress in Leading Driver Programs/AIMaster Piloted Projects.

It is the only thing they need to do in order to guarantee future success, and it doesn’t do their own future prospects any great harm either, rather than endure suffering and taste the bitterness of defeat, because of a failure to do what they can so easily do without any direct peering oversight because of vital national security interests, are they practically decimated and virtually destroyed by competition more able and agile in the field.

That’s what happens whenever they get that simple task wrong, Will Godfrey ……. and they be thoroughly deserving of it whenever it be so worthy a Being in their Gift, Gratefully and Graciously Indebted with Sublime and Surreal Award of Just Reward for Excellence to Excess.

What do you rate their chances of getting things right, for a change, whenever the possibility of everything going wrong is always so strong in systems stuck with maintaining the past and its failures rather than celebrating in and providing for what the future holds in store?

cc … the MOD re AWEsome Existential Experimentation

[Thank you. Your comment will be displayed soon after reviewing.]…… which should really be written as ….. Your comment may not be displayed at all any time soon after reviewing. 🙂

………………………………………..

amanfromMars 1 Fri 21 May 10:22 [2105211022] …. speculating wildly, says on
https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2021/05/21/cryptocurrency_us_treasury/

Changed Glory 0Days indeed …… and just in time too to witness global fiat reserve currency collapses and rebalancings

If you can’t beat them, join them then appears to be the Fed’s new default position and that is tantamount to an admission of defeat against overwhelmingly superior forces and an invisible intangible foe/anonymous autonomous program although anyone/anything claiming it as a victory will be hard pressed to cogently express its benefits and virtues/advantages and conveniences.

………………………………..

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

three × three =