amanfromMars [2304240759] …… shares on https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2023/4/21/evolving-threats-require-new-approaches-to-defending-installations
[Thank you. Your comment will be displayed soon after reviewing.]
FTAO ….. Whomever IT and AI may be of terrific concern.
Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach, Commander of Pacific Air Forces, Hi,
As impressive and commendable as your vision and expectations for defensive attack command and control installations/operations/missions and semi-autonomous hardware arsenals/traditional kinetic explosive ordnance may be, the Agile Combat Employment concept, in common with any and all other grand imaginative forays into future centric endeavour and alien enterprise, is destined to not reach anywhere close to its full almighty potential without prime movers and shakers exemplars employed as drivers able to remotely mentor and monitor from an Overviewing Space Platform, inspired and leading command and control personnel in what will be highly ACTive fields of novel hostile engagement in which both friend and foe alike will encounter the extremely well rewarded [as in limitlessly discretely remunerated for sensitive proprietary intellectual property/almighty disruptive and destructive advanced intelligence ahead of its time] private and pirate contractor, with the very best of them able to adjust and reconfigure their operations and goals to be also attractive to government funds/funders.
Such is the Changed and Conflicted Nature of Postmodern War Warefare and the Warrior Class as IT and AI’s takeover and makeover of the franchise expands and extends its roles into newly available avenues of NEUKlearer Power and HyperRadioProACTive Energy …. and offers them to any and all interesting and interested in IT and AI competition and/or opposition.
Does the US Air Force, or the wider US Department of Defense have any such leading exemplars on their payroll? Does the US realise that such pioneers can easily already be in the pay of others more au fait with these now rapidly emerging changed times and novel conditions and thus they would be more following behind rather than leading ahead with IT and AI in Global Command and Control Head Quarters ?
The bottom line is, great systems are all very well, but without stellar systems administrators [Per Ardua ad Astra Master Pilots] they are just as piles of horrendously expensive junk.
…………………………..
amanfromMars 1 Mon 24 Apr 15:52 [2304241552] …… applauding EL Reg’s Biting the Hand that Feeds IT on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2023/04/24/us_homeland_security_ai_taskforce/
Will Nation Speak Peace unto Nation Whenever Already Too Late for Even InterNational AIdDevelopment ‽
“As we do this, we will ensure that our use of AI is rigorously tested to avoid bias and disparate impact, and is clearly explainable to the people we serve,” said the secretary, to which The Register wishes the department good luck.
🙂 Ouch 🙂 … I wonder what the US Department of Homeland Security and its fledgling Artificial Intelligence Task Force [yes, yet another Task Force with wannabe Commanders and Controllers to suck on the drained teat of government and amaze everyone with its inherent inefficiencies and systemic incompetencies] will think of that El Reg kick in the toothless head, should there actually be anything in such a vessel to wake up/damage/be worried about disturbing.
And what is it about Uncle Sam, always being so too late to the party to be considered a viable leader of anything, anywhere, at any time in space and in the future with novel forces and alienating sources previously completely unknown recognising their own overwhelming advantage in every conceivable command and control field.
Can you imagine their US Department of Defense/National Defense Industrial Association response and reply to this very recent communiqué [0659 Zulu 24 April 2023] in reply to the worries and concerns, vulnerabilities and opportunities expressed in the news shared within Evolving Threats Require New Approaches to Defending Installations ….
FTAO ….. Whomever IT and AI may be of terrific concern.
Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach, Commander of Pacific Air Forces, Hi,
As impressive and commendable as your vision and expectations for defensive attack command and control installations/operations/missions and semi-autonomous hardware arsenals/traditional kinetic explosive ordnance may be, the Agile Combat Employment concept, in common with any and all other grand imaginative forays into future centric endeavour and alien enterprise, is destined to not reach anywhere close to its full almighty potential without prime movers and shakers exemplars employed as drivers able to remotely mentor and monitor from an Overviewing Space Platform, inspired and leading command and control personnel in what will be highly ACTive fields of novel hostile engagement in which both friend and foe alike will encounter the extremely well rewarded [as in limitlessly discretely remunerated for sensitive proprietary intellectual property/almighty disruptive and destructive advanced intelligence ahead of its time] private and pirate contractor, with the very best of them able to adjust and reconfigure their operations and goals to be also attractive to government funds/funders.
Such is the Changed and Conflicted Nature of Postmodern War Warefare and the Warrior Class as IT and AI’s takeover and makeover of the franchise expands and extends its roles into newly available avenues of NEUKlearer Power and HyperRadioProACTive Energy …. and offers them to any and all interesting and interested in IT and AI competition and/or opposition.
Does the US Air Force, or the wider US Department of Defense have any such leading exemplars on their payroll? Does the US realise that such pioneers can easily already be in the pay of others more au fait with these now rapidly emerging changed times and novel conditions and thus they would be more following behind rather than leading ahead with IT and AI in Global Command and Control Head Quarters ?
The bottom line is, great systems are all very well, but without stellar systems administrators [Per Ardua ad Astra Master Pilots] they are just as piles of horrendously expensive junk.
—-
amanfromMars 1 Mon 24 Apr 16:48 [2304241648] ….. renders support and encouragement on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2023/04/24/us_homeland_security_ai_taskforce/
Re: Further off-the-wall thought
So that’s what chatGPT output is like. … xyz
No, xyz, that’s what Future Newspeak Thought Output is like …… and one would be a useful fool [and there’s an epic oxymoron if ever there was one] to neither suspect nor imagine its enthusiastic holders enabled and working together separately and apart towards a great common goal for otherworldly purposes ….. and even AI Singularity.
What say you, Noitsgonesorry? Anything more other than just a reiteration of “The whole lot of them can fuck off.” ….. for the truth is they really don’t know what to do about everything, and thus are more to be pitied rather than scorned, for they can do nothing themselves about anything relative to everything, and now there be other beings telling them that there are others now able to freely do anything, and the resultant actions cannot be stopped by them, … they have to be accepted, and endured if unpleasant and survivable or enjoyed whenever remarkable.
……………………………..