amanfromMars 1 Wed 29 Jul 09:59  …. saying more on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2015/07/28/automattic_says_spooks_asked_for_something_it_cant_reveal/
Exposing Enemy Action and confirming ITs Existential Threat within APT ACTivity?
In this case, he approaches something like a coherant question, which is interesting, but the last few words let him down – replace “privileged and proprietary information” with “personal user information” and the comment would be perfect. …. AndyS
Methinks there are those who would agree that privileged and proprietary information is inclusive of personal user information and a much more valid selection of words exploring a whole host of further considerations in and for the fields that be phishing and phorming both singular and collective input for mass and intelligent agency output.
????? Does a reluctance and/or failure to reasonably respond to a clear enough simple question indicate that privileged and proprietary information is/will be compromised with a reply which is not wholly truthful and hiding a secret? You know, that evasion of inquiry that destroys the legitimacy of all sorts of ponzi organisations and politically incorrect bodies.
We’re all bots, besides. … Anonymous Coward
Quite so, most probably, AC. And all are not equal with some who may be both a few and many, considerably smarter and more active than ever before thought humanly possible.