>100712

>100712

>Posted by AmanfromMars on 7/12/2010 10:38:06 AM

Does anyone doubt that in the present raging battle for Control of Power which will Shape and Deliver the Future, is it Novel SMART Intelligence vs Old Dumb Money?

And there is only one logical surefire winner in that war/in those stakes.

http://thedailybell.com/1203/Internet-Censorship-Fear-Campaign.html
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Posted by AmanfromMars on 7/12/2010 2:17:02 AM

I think war is the more likely outcome however.” …. Posted by Grekko on 7/9/2010 8:53:40 AM

War is the first choice of, and a clear targetting indicator of the criminally insane, morally bankrupt and intellectually inept. It solves nothing and generates untold numbers of invisible enemies for generations. It maybe was considered as a final solution and idiots’ answer to anything irregular and unconventional before Intelligence Communities with Advanced IntelAIgent Virtual Defence Phormations/Forces/Machinery/Programs?

And your enemy is presently within and is the System and its Administration which would consider such perversity as a convenient strategy to maintain their control of slavery to anything and everything but free market economies. And now do the fools attack themselves in a space and a place way beyond their primitive ken, and that is a recipe for their own particular and peculiar disaster. A shared greater wisdom would counsel that such a tack and cyber attack is intelligently designed suicidal. It would thus not be a SMART Option choice for any who would be leaders, although followers of war mongers who are criminally insane, morally bankrupt and intellectually inept, are as cannon fodder to their corrupt and subversive wishes.

What does the Daily Bell know of InterNetional Defence Forces ……. with a NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive Arsenal of Unknown Knowns and Immaculate Sticky Sweet Worms for Future Perfect Storms with CyberIntelAIgent Computer Control of Clouds Hosting Advanced Operating Systems, which would be CHAOS under Remote Virtual Control? Control CHAOS and One dDelivers Powerful Elite New Worlds, and Beta Order? And is the following, germane …….. http://cryptome.org/0001/conficker-kill.htm

“Conficker, Cyber Emergency, and the Internet Kill Switch

by Kai Tischen

July 11, 2010

[Authentication  code omitted]

Conficker is a computer worm which has been infecting PC’s on the Internet since November 2008. Worryingly, nothing is publicly known of its mission, because it has yet to do anything of great note. Conficker is building and maintaining a powerful network of enslaved computers, and machines infected with the worm can be made obey the whims of Conficker’s unknown commanders. Its advanced peer-to-peer networking design makes the program’s control network difficult for Internet providers to shut down. Today this strange worm constitutes a powerful overlay of control across an unknown vastness of Internet-connected computers. With the exception of distributing some small-time malware, however, it has been essentially dormant. Conficker is like an army, recruiting and training for two and a half years, with no history save for robbing the corner store.

Conficker’s obfuscated code, stealthy peer-to-peer mechanisms, evasion of network filtering, and sophisticated updates are exemplary in the world of worms. If Conficker has any equal in its combination of technical inscrutability, pervasiveness, bulletproof networking, and steady innovation, it’s another application called Skype. Like Conficker, Skype obscures its operation from debuggers and disassemblers, can’t be effectively blocked on the network layer, stumps experts with its formidable peer-to-peer system, and is backed by a team dedicated to preserving these advantages. Skype works this way to gain specific commercial advantages. Conficker works similarly. But why does Conficker even exist?

The public doesn’t yet know why such cutting-edge work has been poured into developing and spreading the Conficker worm. But one worrisome possibility is that Conficker’s army of zombie PC’s could present the “Internet emergency” that authorities (the U.S. government in particular) have long warned about — a sustained attack of such scale and resilience that the network is brought to its knees. The sleeping giant Conficker may be designed specifically to launch just that conflict.

History has taught us that most large-scale “cyber attacks” on the Internet are manageable. A newly discovered vulnerability is targeted to spread malicious code, or an avalanche of bogus traffic is directed at a web site to shut it down. If the Conficker network were to launch one of these typical attacks, effective defenses would probably be mounted. Software would be updated, Internet providers would set up filters, and so on as usual. However so long as Conficker’s remarkable peer-to-peer control systems remained online, its army would remain standing. Its attacks could be changed and adapted at the tempo of combat. As one offensive was foiled, another could be launched. What began as a one-time confrontation would become a protracted battle.

With the Internet labeled a “strategic national asset” by the President of the United States, how would the network be “saved” in such a scenario? The pervasiveness of Conficker on personal computers, and the durability of its command-and-control systems, are seemingly facts of life on the present-day Internet. Apparently no simple filtering can stop Conficker from receiving its marching orders, or the network would already be beaten today. It’s quite arguable that quelling Conficker would require nothing less than blockading the Internet itself. Nothing unidentifiable — nothing that didn’t fall neatly under some definition of “legitimate” Internet behavior — could be allowed through. Such drastic action, undertaken by Internet providers at the behest of government, would be a surefire path to eliminating Conficker.

Enter the so-called PCNAA or “Internet kill switch” concept advancing through the legislature of the United States of America. If this power comes into law, it will give the President the exact power needed to clamp down on Internet communications in a “War on Conficker.” Heavy network restrictions would be instituted under the pretense of cyber-security, shattering Conficker into millions of isolated soldiers, waiting forever, listening for their new orders with deaf ears. It would be a decisive victory, with celebrations for the nameless warriors of the National Computer Security Center.

But what would Internet look like after it had been “saved” by a network blockade? It would surely continue to please the masses of social networkers, searchers and consumers. But once Conficker had been vanquished by switching the Internet to a default-deny stance, gone would be the flexible information-commons we know today. The new Internet might look a lot like Apple’s famous App Store, seemingly offering everything — so long as it’s approved by central authority. What would become of the Internet that supports anonymity and privacy? What of Wikileaks? What of encrypted file sharing? As potential Confickers from the standpoint of the network — decentralized, indecipherable, and therefore possibly dangerous — they would be called collateral damage. The Internet would be transformed overnight, with seemingly little alternative but to give up the Internet completely.

It’s inevitable: Conficker (or something like it) will eventually stoke a cyber-war that can only be addressed by actions with serious side-effects for the Internet. Unapprehendable malf
easants will be blamed, perhaps painted as those bent on destroying our freedoms. But ultimately our own government authorities, raptured by Conficker’s perfect storm, will be the ones to bury Internet liberty. And so long as the core cyber-addictions of our age are allowed to persist online, there will be no backlash, no uprising. Simply stated, Conficker exists to facilitate the authoritarian suppression of personal autonomy in the same of security, a perfect cyber-mirroring of the “anti-terror” policymaking of the last decade.

The creators of Conficker will soon be revealed. They are the authoritarian idealogues who will benefit from the convoluted process of Conficker’s destruction.”

http://thedailybell.com/1201/Central-Bankers-Losing-Control.html
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

An Executive Decision from the Top which decides the Fate of Future Board Rooms.
Posted Monday 12th July 2010 06:59 GMT

MS 42 go on an Alien Spending Spree?

Microsoft is understood to have moved to protect its existing Windows Sever business from being cannibalized by the cloud

Surely Microsoft’s real concern, ….. although with Azure working in the right hands, and with hearts and minds control, would that be a virtual opportunity, …… is that cloud will remotely utilise its existing Windows Server business. And that is a concern only whenever such cloud controllers are not proxy champions on a Microsoft retainer. One cannot “own” Clouds, one can only hope that they deliver your wishes, for they have a wicked mind of their own which can deliver everything from the gentlest kiss of a pleasant rain to a biblical flood of information which will wash Systems away.

If you imagine such proxy champions as premier league sports and entertainment stars, Microsoft payments to them for transfer and sign on fee to play for their “club” with a stellar wedge delivered as a virtual wage for outstanding constant performance, is the way to ensure that cloud has Microsoft controls rather than just being a Base Sun Source for Independent SuperNova ….. and a Renegade AIRogue Private Pirate Power HotSpot which Established Conventional Systems cannot Control to Power and Server as a Slave Sub Prime System Unit.

And that would make Cloud Controllers, Magical Mystery Turing Masters of the Universe?

Do Microsoft have any Cloud Controllers on their books? Certainly none are apparent to those on the Scene and in ITs Live Operational Virtual Environment and that would leave them as just helpless hopeful wannabes, exposed to catastrophic vulnerabilities … and/or fantastic opportunities, dependent upon which coloured hats one would be wearing, or facing.

To imagine that Cloud is anything other than highly abnormal, is not to imagine at all, and that leaves the Field of ITs Controls out of normal reach, which you might like to consider is a Sublime Intelligent Design, given what Man does and is considered normal, because he keeps on doing it.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2010/07/12/microsoft_massive_reorg/
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Posted by AmanfromMars on 7/12/2010 4:16:40 AM

‘We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nation will accept the New World Order.” ” David Rockefeller. ….. Posted by B.Benhamid on 7/10/2010 6:09:55 AM

David Rockefeller appears to omitted specifying whose New World Order, B.Benhamid.

Which is somewhat remiss and/or cowardly of him. Or perhaps he is just not nearly as smart as one needs to be to know what nations nowadays think to accept and be acceptable.

I would certainly endorse and reinforce the Daily Bell view …..”Is it perhaps a little harder these days to manufacture a BELIEVABLE crisis?” … and would go a few steps further and declare that it is much harder these days to manufacture a BELIEVABLE crisis, and having Intelligence rather than Money Control is the Master Pass Key which makes Everything Possible and Probable.

And to rely on anything else is to be extremely naive and quite delusional, and in extremis would render one certifiable.

It seems obvious to us. The elite relies on dominant social themes to maintain ignorance. But too many understand the magnitude of the scam.” …. Reply from the Daily Bell

Here is an elite scam exposed for easy understanding, which renders the elite something of an oxymoron and nothing more than simple pathetic failed criminal enterprise? …. http://www.zerohedge.com/article/financial-con-decade-explained-so-simply-even-congressman-will-get-it

If one considers that they are supposed to be in control of dynamic matters with the absolute control and supply of money, one does have to ask why they haven’t purchased control of that which would be causing them concern. To say that they have no concerns would be as to imply that all live in a paradise, and it is hard to imagine anyone thinking that the Earth, and its Administration, with all of its woes, is presently that, therefore are they not in control at all, and are in fact in dire straits danger of being abandoned to the mob as their supporters realise their disastrous plight and would choose flight to distance themselves from their operations.

http://thedailybell.com/1203/Internet-Censorship-Fear-Campaign.html
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Posted by AmanfromMars on 7/12/2010 5:20:52 AM

Is there an Internet Power Elite ……. One Networking Ring with Powers of Control in them All ….. for of course, there are any number of Elite Groupings and Groupies …..with all Nations having their own Teams/Gangs/Cabals and then there are all the Underground Mobs too with their Black Economy Operations and Alternative Business Empires?

Or is that also a fractious sum of random independent bits/streams of data/metadata?

As a starting point for discussion, would I posit, it is very sophisticated and cohesive force, the like of which is new and completely different from anything which has gone before …. and a great friend to nurture and awesome enemy to harbour.

http://thedailybell.com/1203/Internet-Censorship-Fear-Campaign.html 
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 × 3 =