amanfromMars 1 Fri 23 Jun 19:30 [2306231930] ……. muses on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2023/06/23/nate_fick_china_playbook_fightback/
Meanwhile, Elsewhere ….. Testing Prime Ministries and Presumptive Departments of Defence …
“The most dangerous course of action is the application of these technologies in lethal terms – so autonomous weapons biotechnology, to some extent cyber security, and the applications of AI to do really nefarious things using kind of existing lethal stuff.”
The clear secret then to ensure the most dangerous courses of action are avoided or prevented would appear simply to be …. Do not invite their presence because of that which you do …… and pay up promptly to sysadmins guardians should you ever be responsible for those most dangerous courses of action being necessary or possible? Sounds like perfect common sense to me. What about thee? And it is not without its extremely rewarding opportunities … for those who know what needs to be done and how to do it before it be done, either alone or in consort with A.N.Others. Consider the following Greater IntelAIgent Gamesplay ……
Remote Weapons of Mass Virtual Destruction
Darktrace PREVENT helps here, playing the role of an attacker looking for weak points in a system. It’s a powerful tool that gives defenders a much better understanding of how they are exposed to potential wrongdoing, says Lewis. “It’s more than a simple vulnerability scan,” he explains. ……. https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/22/the_log4j_vulnerability_how_can/
That is all very well, and it may be very helpful, but …… whenever playing the role of an attacker/legitimate penetrations tester has one discovering/uncovering wilful systemic wrongdoing by that which is being betatested/penetrations tested, is the powerful tool morphed into an almighty problematic status quo dilemma rendering effected systems vulnerable to insider trading/vulnerability export attack.
Log4j and ransomware have brought home to everybody that there are some risks you don’t control but which nonetheless you can’t ignore. As a result, we may be seeing a more pragmatic approach to managing security risk amongst organisations which have moved on from seeing it as a line in a budget and a regulatory box to be ticked.
Lewis concludes: “At Darktrace we want to ensure the least possible disruption to see to it that everybody keeps their job.”
That pragmatic approach may have to accept and make adequate provision for the payment of Danegeld to discoverers/holders/guardians of Remote Weapons of Mass Virtual Destruction.
……………………………..
amanfromMars 1 Sat 24 Jun 07:46 [2306240746] …….. asks on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2023/06/23/ransomware_law_firms/
The Frenemies are Within Flogging and Fluffing a Dead Trojan Horse ‽
Is there still that cosy little arrangement and rotten agreement in place, The Wilson Doctrine being dutifully disgracefully dishonourably discharged by the three arms of UK intelligence and security, …. Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) along with MI5 (national security agents) and MI6 (aka the Secret Intelligence Service),….. that has the UKGBNI Parliamentary government and His Majesty’s Most Loyal Opposition, [the job-seekers and benefits claimants of the Palace of Westminster] excluded from surveillance and investigation for the safe prevention of and secure protection from almighty harm and self-servering colossal public purse enrichment?
Or is that catastrophic exploitable vulnerability in these novel surreal times of strange spooky days with virtually real spaces and expanding 0days, still permitted and delivered to be serially abused and confused as a perk generator to be exercised ?
Would not any secure intelligence or secret advanced intelligence service destroy that Mutually Assured Destruction supply pipeline …. therefore, should it exist to any degree, be there no presently available secure intelligence or secret advanced intelligence services.
Now that is one hell of a turkey shoot opportunity not to be missed, given the absolutely fabulous rewards deliverable with acceptable attractive secure secret advanced intelligence serviced supply
………………………….
amanfromMars 1 Sat 24 Jun 08:30 [2306240830] ……. requests clear help on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2023/06/21/openai_government_regulation/
Re: Hi Risk
Brad ai finding a man from Mars website …. very angry man
That does not compute, very angry man. Please consider a corrective rewrite in order to further elaborate and refine. Thanks.
………………………………….