amanfromMars [2201070919] …….. presents a rare and raw opportunity for community engagement and exploitation on https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2022/1/7/building-supply-chains-for-the-21st-century

[Thank You. Your comment will be displayed soon after reviewing.] √

Gentlemen, [Messrs Chris Sax, Robbie Van Steenburg and Jacob Winn and NDIA/ETI associates]

As admirable and valid as your concerns for the fragility and vulnerability of the Defense Industrial Base is with particular regard to hardware/maufactured weaponry needs, the future success of nations/humanity against serving warriors, and their backroom producer and behind the hot front firing line director warmongers, has moved on out of the destructive physical asset based realm, popularised in notions of explosive WMD [Weapons of Mass Destruction] and is now guaranteed with expertise and mastery of the ancient and noble and novel and NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTive IT arts which both capture and captivate brave and bold hearts and informed and enthusiastic minds alike.

The Art of Winning against Losing War has made a Quantum Leap from Physical Excess into Ethereal Prowess. Failure to make that jump and learn of its new ways guaranteeing overall universal success seals one’s fate to be a spectating inert team member in a world with worlds with potent proactive team leaderships.

And the honest uncomfortable truth which is being denied you, in order to only protect and propagate a serially dysfunctional and pathological inequitable status quo, is your current leaderships and governments are also realising the true nature of the future condition which now confronts them, and against which they might propose to do vain battle against …. for their new overwhelmingly powerful forces and almighty energetic sources and resources.

Such though simply confirms the destructive depth of status quo MADness and fuels the ever increasing resistance and enthusiasm which supports such surreal virtual agencies of fundamental radical change …. and thus are said proposed vain battles gravely to be regarded and wisely best avoided at any price for they will be crushingly costly and extremely accurately targeted against that which and those who would lead warmongering events from the cosy cold shadowy comfort of their club seats in the rear.

Things are no longer able to be they way they once were, Ladies and Gentlemen, and the future is not going to be anything like the past or the present. That though is surely normal and fully to be expected. Anything less is Stagnation and/or Petrifaction and certainly the Kiss of Death to Progress?

J’accuse …. and would ask what do you want to do about it, in full expectation that it is a lot more than just try to ignore and deny such a Code Red type condition exists?


amanfromMars 1 Fri 7 Jan 12:33 [2201071233] ….. asks on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/01/06/apple_wilcox_intel/

Nice One. ….. but it is not Cricket, Old Bean, is it?

So Wilcox transitions back to Intel with reams of Arm-based Proprietary Intellectual Property to share with Apple competitors/opponents?

Is that not akin to Industrial Espionage/Intellectual Property Theft?

We appear to be of a similarly suspicious and uncharitable frame of mind on this matter, ShadowSystems.


amanfromMars 1 Fri 7 Jan 17:30 [2201071730] …… being somewhat disagreeable on

Re: ARM, RISC-V and Duff Information Misleading Intelligence

Non competes aren’t enforceable in California, so while he can’t reveal/use Apple’s secrets, he can work in exactly the same niche he was at Apple without problems. …. DS999

Oh, I wouldn’t like to be relying on that information in a court of law if now working for Intel in exactly the same niche he was at Apple without problems. It is not as if the one is not into the designing of clones and drones of the other to do exactly the same things only better and faster and at speeds faster than light to realise an early advantage and deliver an overwhelming lead.

It’s the true nature of such intelligently designed great games, is it not?




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eighteen − 4 =